Warum Sozialismus nicht funktioniert
Und bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen und Frauenquote und Geisteswissenschaften auch nicht.
Schönes Beispiel, wobei mir nicht klar ist, ob das fiktiv oder so passiert ist, durch Leserhinweis gefunden unter http://www.thecommentator.com/article/646/does_socialism_work_a_classroom_experiment:
An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama’s socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich; a great equalizer.
The professor then said, “OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama’s plan”. All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will receive an A (substituting grades for dollars – something closer to home and more readily understood by all).
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.
As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little.
The second test average was a D! No one was happy.
When the third test rolled around, the average was an F.
As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.
To their great surprise, all failed and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.
Interessant auch die Schlussfolgerungen. Ich finde vor allem diese drei beleuchtenswert, weil sie zusammenfassen, warum Grundeinkommen, Geisteswissenschaften und leistungslose Frauenquote nicht funktionieren:
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
Besonders kritisch ist aber die fünfte Schlussfolgerung, denn sie beschreibt genau das, was hier in Deutschland bereits eingetreten ist:
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
Und da sind wir nicht nur mitten drin, sondern die Leute, die nicht arbeiten, sind inzwischen die Mehrheit und bestimmen per „Demokratie”, dass das Prinzip immer weiter geführt wird.
Erinnert Euch nur mal an die Forderungen der Soziologen in der Humboldt-Universität. Sie wollen versorgt werden, aber für den Arbeitsmarkt vorbereitet werden wollen sie nicht. Sie lesen Marx und üben „Gesellschaftskritik”.