Mehr U-Boot-Inspirationen: Alten weißen Mann wegen Sicherheitsbedenken gefeuert
Das ist auch schön.
Ich habe die Berichte über das U-Boot vorhin nicht alle vollständig gelesen. War dumm von mir, denn das beste habe ich überlesen, aber ein Leser hat aufgepasst:
Die hatten einen "erfahrenen 50-Jährigen. Den haben sie rausgeworfen, nachdem er Zweifel an der Sicherheit angemeldet hat. 1/ https://t.co/yWTPKbHCyq
— Ulrich Elkmann (@elkmann_ulrich) June 21, 2023
2/ Und der vermutet, die Kunststtoffasers des Rumpfs könnten Materialermüdungen gezeigt haben.
— Ulrich Elkmann (@elkmann_ulrich) June 21, 2023
3/ Und das war auch der Grund, warum die Titanic 1912 überhaupt gesunken ist, trotz der zig Querschotte (1 "e"). Weil der Stahl des Rumpfs….
— Ulrich Elkmann (@elkmann_ulrich) June 21, 2023
4/ … mürbe geworden ist im kalten Wasser & der Eisberg bei der touchierung den Rumpf über die Hälfte der Schiffslänge unter Wasser aufgerissen hat.
— Ulrich Elkmann (@elkmann_ulrich) June 21, 2023
Da hätte ich auch selbst drauf kommen können, denn im zitierten Text steht das auch drin:
Former OceanGate director of marine operations David Lochridge — one of those “50-year-old white guys” Rush wanted to avoid hiring for not being “inspirational” enough — was fired by Rush in 2018 after he reportedly blew the whistle on OceanGate by raising safety concerns over their first-of-a-kind carbon fiber hull and other systems.
From TechCrunch, “A whistleblower raised safety concerns about OceanGate’s submersible in 2018. Then he was fired.”:
David Lochridge was terminated in January 2018 after presenting a scathing quality control report on the vessel to OceanGate’s senior management, including founder and CEO Stockton Rush, who is on board the missing vessel.
According to a court filing by Lochridge, the preamble to his report read: “Now is the time to properly address items that may pose a safety risk to personnel. Verbal communication of the key items I have addressed in my attached document have been dismissed on several occasions, so I feel now I must make this report so there is an official record in place.”
The report detailed “numerous issues that posed serious safety concerns,” according to the filing. These included Lochridge’s worry that “visible flaws” in the carbon fiber supplied to OceanGate raised the risk of small flaws expanding into larger tears during “pressure cycling.” These are the huge pressure changes that the submersible would experience as it made its way and from the deep ocean floor. He noted that a previously tested scale model of the hull had “prevalent flaws.”
Carbon fiber composites can be stronger and lighter than steel, making a submersible naturally buoyant. But they can also be prone to sudden failure under stress. The hull that Lochridge was writing about was made by Spencer Composites, the only company to have previously made a carbon fiber hull for a manned submersible. (That submersible was commissioned by explorer Steve Fossett for a record-breaking dive, but he died in a light aircraft crash before it could be used.)
Lochridge’s recommendation was that non-destructive testing of the Titan’s hull was necessary to ensure a “solid and safe product.” The filing states that Lochridge was told that such testing was impossible, and that OceanGate would instead rely on its much touted acoustic monitoring system.
The company claims this technology, developed in-house, uses acoustic sensors to listen for the tell-tale sounds of carbon fibers in the hull deteriorating to provide “early warning detection for the pilot with enough time to arrest the descent and safely return to surface.”
Lochridge, however, worried in the lawsuit that the system would not reveal flaws until the vessel was descending, and then might only provide “milliseconds” of warning before a catastrophic implosion.
Russell McDuff, a veteran oceanographer and chairman of OceanGate’s scientific and research foundation for three years, noted that contact with the Titan was lost on Sunday after only an hour and 45 minutes. “This suggests to me that they might have still been in the water column, descending to the Titanic,” told TechCrunch in a phone interview.
Lochridge also strongly encouraged OceanGate to have a classification agency, such as the American Bureau of Shipping, inspect and certify the Titan.
A day after filing his report, Lochridge was summoned to a meeting with Rush and company’s human resources, engineering and operations directors. There, the filing states, he was also informed that the manufacturer of the Titan’s forward viewport would only certify it to a depth of 1,300 meters due to OceanGate’s experimental design. The filing states that OceanGate refused to pay for the manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the Titan’s intended depth of 4,000 meters. The Titanic lies about 3,800 meters below the surface.
The filing also claims that hazardous flammable materials were being used within the submersible.
At the end of the meeting, after saying that he would not authorize any manned tests of Titan without a scan of the hull, Lochridge was fired and escorted from the building.
Lochridge, who claimed he was discharged in retaliation for being a whistleblower, made his filing after OceanGate sued him in federal court in Seattle that June. OceanGate has accused him of sharing confidential information with two individuals, as well as with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). In the lawsuit, OceanGate characterized Lochridge’s report as false, and accused him of committing fraud by manufacturing a reason to be fired.
Ja. Quality is a myth.
Wobei ich das jetzt ulkig finde, dass das U-Boot aus Plastik/Carbonfaser gemacht ist. Das kennt man von Fotostativen. Die aus Carbon sind leichter und steifer als die aus Alu, wackeln weniger, kommen auch deshalb mit noch weniger Material aus. Wenn man ein Alu-Stativ verbiegt, hat man ein verbogenes Stativ, aber immer noch ein Stativ. Man darf nur niemals versuchen, es zurückzubiegen, dann bricht es. Carbonstative aber geben dann sofort nach und sind dann, wenn sie wegen Überlastung oder Schaden nachgeben, sofort unbrauchbar und ein Fall für den Müll.
Und dass man den, der warnt, dass das nicht dauerstabil und fest genug ist, Mängel hat, feuert, rauseskortiert und verklagt, das ist schon deftig.