Kinder als Schutzschilde der EU

Im Nachgang zu meiner Stellungnahme für den Bundestag.

Ich hatte doch geschrieben und gesagt, dass ich die Sache mit der Kinderpornographie für einen Vorwand halte. Man nimmt das als Türöffner, weil dagegen ja niemand etwas sagen kann, wer würde schon etwas gegen den Schutz von Kindern sagen wollen. Ich habe aber den starken – und durch die Sache mit dem Bankkonto begründeten – Verdacht, dass es hier um etwas völlig anders geht, nämlich die politische Überwachung und Ausforschung im Stil der Stasi, und Kinder nur als Schutzschild gegen Angriffe vorgehalten werden, wie beim (oder bei der?) Hamas.

Hier schreibt ein Danny Mekić über das Thema:

The European Commission wants to turn digital communication apps, such as WhatsApp, iMessage, Instagram, TikTok and X, into mass surveillance tools so that digital communications of all EU citizens, including their live conversations, photos and videos, can be automatically scanned for criminal offences.[1] Even of citizens who are not suspected of any crime. This proposal for a CSAM regulation has been unanimously condemned by hundreds of academics,[2] privacy regulators,[3] and even internal legal experts at the Council of the European Union itself for its gross violation of privacy rights,[4] but also because the technology to be used to implement it is fundamentally flawed. Indeed, artificial intelligence cannot accurately detect criminal activity, but will falsely report millions of innocent citizens as suspects. Meanwhile, criminals easily circumvent this system by deleting these apps from their phones or disappearing on the dark web. While ineffective, European Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson’s proposal does mean an end to private digital conversations for everyone and, for obvious reasons, is incompatible with the right to privacy and freedom of communication and the presumption of innocence.[5] On Thursday 14 September, it emerged that there is insufficient support in the Council of the European Union for her proposal.[6]

Worryingly, a day later, on 15 September, the Commissioner commissioned a paid advertising campaign on X (formerly Twitter) targeting the Netherlands,[7] Sweden,[8] Belgium,[9] Finland,[10] Slovenia,[11] Portugal[12] and the Czech Republic,[13] countries that did not want to vote for the current proposal, according to leaked minutes from the 14 September meeting. The campaign, which has been viewed more than four million times, uses shocking images of young girls alongside sinister-looking men, ominous music, and commits a form of emotional blackmail by suggesting that opponents of the proposed legislation would not want to protect children.[14] Equally misleading is its claim that the proposed legislation would be supported by the majority of Europeans based on a survey that highlighted only the benefits but not the drawbacks of the proposed legislation. On the contrary, surveys by research firms YouGov[15] and Novus,[16] which highlighted the drawbacks, showed virtually no support for the proposal among the European population.

Im Prinzip das, was ich gerade vorgetragen habe.

Es geht um die politische Überwachung von allem und jedem, und Kinderpornographie wird nur als Überzeugungshebel eingesetzt, um die dumme Mehrheit zu täuschen und zu dirigieren.

Kinder als Schutzschilde der EU.